Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black Shadow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is just a bit better than Apple iPhone X, with a 91.1 score against 88.1. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is incredibly thinner but heavier than Apple iPhone X. The Apple iPhone X has a way better performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit more vivid screen than iPhone X, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 1968 x 2184 resolution, a lot larger display and much more brightness. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a way better 200 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone X. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy iPhone X, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.