Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-07-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a global score of 88.1 against 82.2. The Apple iPhone X is a way thinner and extremely lighter device than Xperia XZ2 Premium, even though both were released with only 9 months difference. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a sharper screen than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the display, more screen brightness and a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840.
The iPhone X has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Xperia XZ2 Premium captures just a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution camera.
Apple iPhone X features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with improved battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
The Apple iPhone X costs a bit more than Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.