Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Xperia XZs, with an 88.1 score against 77.2. The iPhone X design is a little bit thinner but a little heavier than the Xperia XZs, and they were released only 7 months apart. The iPhone X counts with a faster CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a larger number of cores.
IPhone X has a bit better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little greater pixels amount per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. IPhone X features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Sony Xperia XZs has just a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 2900mAh battery capacity. The Xperia XZs features a way better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and faster 960 frames per second video frame rates.
Apple iPhone X costs a lot more money than Xperia XZs, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.