Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, with an 88.1 score against 84.5. The Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older device than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, but Apple made it a little thinner and lighter anyway. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a more vivid screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit lower pixels number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a bigger display and much more brightness.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone X and Xiaomi 14T Pro feature very similar memory for applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a way better camera than Apple iPhone X, because it has a back camera with lot more MP, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.