Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-03-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, getting a score of 88.1 against 82.3. IPhone X is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, but Apple managed to build it thinner and somewhat lighter. The iPhone X has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and more brightness.
IPhone X has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone X features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.