Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, having a overall score of 88.1 against 82.9. Even though the iPhone X is older than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density, more brightness and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The iPhone X has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.