Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, having an 88.1 score against 86.6. The iPhone X design is way lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone X counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. IPhone X has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 74% greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes much clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.