Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-04-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a global score of 88.1 against 78.7. Even though the iPhone X is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's design is thinner and a lot lighter. The iPhone X counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X has a much better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's storage to install games and applications is just as good as Apple iPhone X's one, they have the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 71% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.