Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with an 88.1 score against 81.2. Even though the Apple iPhone X is a lot older than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone X has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega pixels camera.
Apple iPhone X has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.