Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's general score of 82.2. Even though the iPhone X is older than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, it's design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. IPhone X counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better display density, a brighter display and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.