Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's 77.5 score. Apple iPhone X's construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it is somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone X has a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. IPhone X takes clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels, the iPhone X also counts with better video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
Apple iPhone X has just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.