Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, with a global score of 88.1 against 83.8. IPhone X is a a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although they were released only 5 months apart. IPhone X has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has as much memory for games and applications as iPhone X, both have the same internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone X features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with faster video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 3400mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.