Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's score of 83.8. The iPhone X is an older phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but Apple managed to build it just a little bit thinner and way lighter. IPhone X features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little brighter screen, a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's storage for games and applications is just as good as iPhone X's one, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher resolution back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.