Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, with an 88.1 score against 84.3. The iPhone X is a older and much thicker phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Apple managed to make it way lighter anyway. The iPhone X has a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has 2 lesser cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a sharper display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really brighter display, a much better resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a way bigger display. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as iPhone X's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better camera than Apple iPhone X, because it has a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments, a much more mega-pixels back camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.