Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 87.9. IPhone X's body is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less and slower CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone X has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display density and a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better video quality.
The iPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.