Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is better than the Xiaomi Poco F5, with an 88.1 score against 78.2. Apple iPhone X is an much older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco F5, but Apple was able to make it a little thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X features a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count in each inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. Apple iPhone X and Xiaomi Poco F5 feature quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F5 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has an 84% bigger battery capacity. IPhone X features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a lot lower resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.