Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's general score of 79.5. The Apple iPhone X is an incredibly older cellphone than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but Apple managed to make it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone X, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit greater pixels density, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and much more brightness.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior CPU than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features as much memory for games and applications as the iPhone X one, they have equal internal memory capacity. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 90 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.