Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 78.7. Although Apple iPhone X is noticeably older than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's body is lighter and thinner. IPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
IPhone X counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.