Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 overall score. The iPhone X is an much older phone than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but Apple managed to make it much thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. IPhone X features a better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little better display pixels density.
The iPhone X counts with a more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone X features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 121% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.