Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Xiaomi Poco X2, getting a score of 88.1 against 79.3. The Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X2, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone X counts with just a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Apple iPhone X has much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 66% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.