Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a general score of 88.1 against 81.6. Even though the iPhone X is notably older than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Apple iPhone X has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a brighter display and a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone X counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.