Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting an 88.1 score against 78.2. The iPhone X design is much thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit better display pixel density.
Apple iPhone X features a quite better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has less cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone X features a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.