Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's 79.5 overall score. Even though the Apple iPhone X is notably older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, it's design is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The iPhone X has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
IPhone X has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone X has a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way smaller back camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a much better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.