Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 86.1. The Apple iPhone X construction is lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a just a little worse pixel count per inch in the display, a way worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite smaller screen. The iPhone X has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.