Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having an 88.1 score against 83.1. The Apple iPhone X features a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a little more vivid display than iPhone X, because although it has a little inferior pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display, a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2710 and a really brighter screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a lot better camera than iPhone X, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.