Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a overall score of 88.1 against 80.3. The Apple iPhone X is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but Apple could make it a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. IPhone X has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit better display pixels density.
The Apple iPhone X features a greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots better videos and photos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a way more mega pixels camera, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and higher 120 fps video frame rates.
The iPhone X counts with a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.