Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having an 88.1 score against 76.6. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is incredibly older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. IPhone X features a quite better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X features a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a quite higher pixels number per display inch. Apple iPhone X has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way more MP camera and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.