Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. The Apple iPhone X is an extremely older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but Apple managed to make it thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
IPhone X has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The iPhone X has a bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.