Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's general score of 83. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone X is way older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Apple iPhone X counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little higher screen density.
IPhone X has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.