Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 global score. The iPhone X is an older phone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway. IPhone X features a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone X counts with a bit faster CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone X, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.