Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-03-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than ZTE Axon 11's global score of 76. The Apple iPhone X design is a little bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 11, but it's just a bit heavier and was released 2 years before. The iPhone X features a bit more powerful processor than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone X counts with a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The ZTE Axon 11 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The ZTE Axon 11 has a much better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.