Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is better than the ZTE Axon 20, with an 88.1 score against 77.8. The Apple iPhone X body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than ZTE Axon 20, although it was released many years before. IPhone X has a bit better CPU than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The ZTE Axon 20 captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
IPhone X has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 20 counts with a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 55% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the ZTE Axon 20, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.