Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2014-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6's 81.1 overall score. Even though Apple iPhone XR is just a bit heavier than the Google Nexus 6, it's thinner and noticeably newer. The Google Nexus 6 features a bit more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Nexus 6 features as much storage capacity for apps and games as iPhone XR, they have the same 64 GB internal memory. IPhone XR counts with a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a larger number of cores.
The iPhone XR counts with a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light images. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 3220mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone XR is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.