Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 6.0 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2015-09-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 760.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a general score of 82 against 79.6. Although iPhone XR is noticeably newer than Google Nexus 6P, it's a little heavier and thicker. Google Nexus 6P has a better looking display than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Nexus 6P features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone XR has a really superior processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also has a 64-bits CPU and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Google Nexus 6P features a little better battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XR shoots a bit better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, a lower (4K) video resolution and a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, iPhone XR is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.