Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the iPhone XR's general score of 82. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is older than iPhone XR, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little bit better display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh. The iPhone XR takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lower video definition and a lower resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.