Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Apple iPhone XR is an extremely heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3. The Apple iPhone XR has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1080 x 2160 resolution. Google Pixel 3's memory to install games and applications is very similar to the iPhone XR one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone XR features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with less megapixels, they both have a same size aperture and the same camera sensor size. IPhone XR has just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 1% larger battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.