Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 82 score against 80.7. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone XR design is just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more vivid display than iPhone XR, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a lot higher pixel count per inch in the display and a bit bigger display.
The iPhone XR and the Google Pixel 3 XL feature extremely similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have the same internal storage capacity. The iPhone XR counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have the same sensor size and the same aperture. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XR, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.