Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Google Pixel 4, with an 82 score against 81.9. The Apple iPhone XR design is older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4. Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 4's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as the Apple iPhone XR one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone XR shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller camera aperture and a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera sensor. The iPhone XR features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.