Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than iPhone XR, with an 82.9 score against 82. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is newer, a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the iPhone XR. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because it has a little bigger display, a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Apple iPhone XR and the Google Pixel 4 XL both count with similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone XR features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller diafragm aperture and a lesser mega pixels camera in the back, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor. The Google Pixel 4 XL features improved battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.