Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the iPhone XR's score of 82. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than iPhone XR. Google Pixel 4a 5G and iPhone XR count with very similar screens, although the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a better pixel density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage. The Apple iPhone XR features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has improved battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same back camera sensor size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.