Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a, getting a global score of 82 against 76.4. Although the Apple iPhone XR is incredibly older and just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a same size display.
The iPhone XR counts with an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 6 cpu cores, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone XR shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a lower video resolution, a smaller aperture and a less MP camera in the back.
Google Pixel 6a has a superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 6a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 6a, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.