Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| 2018-10-26 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than the HTC U11, with a global score of 82 against 77.6. IPhone XR is a newer device than the HTC U11, but it's just a little thicker and heavier. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit superior processor than HTC U11, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The HTC U11 has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixel count per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The HTC U11 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U11 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The iPhone XR captures just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera, the iPhone XR also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
HTC U11 and iPhone XR feature similar battery performance, although the HTC U11 also has a 2% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get HTC U11, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.