Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 global score. The iPhone XR design is a bit lighter than LG Q70, but it is just a little thicker and was released about a year before. The iPhone XR has a slightly better display than LG Q70, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels.
The LG Q70 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone XR counts with a better hardware performance than LG Q70, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The LG Q70 counts with improved battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity. LG Q70 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone XR, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.