Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a way greater display pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone XR has a little better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower video resolution, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.