Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is slightly better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a general score of 82 against 81.2. IPhone XR is better than LG V40 ThinQ, we must highlight that it's also a heavier and a bit thicker cellphone. The iPhone XR has a bit superior CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lesser and slower CPU cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than iPhone XR, because it has a much greater screen density, a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little larger screen. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2942mAh. LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality and a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.