Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40's general score of 77.2. Although it's the best in our current comparison, iPhone XR's body is extremely older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 40. IPhone XR features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 features just a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a little higher pixels number in each inch of screen, much more display brightness, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 40 captures better videos and photos than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture, a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 has a very superior battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.