Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 general score. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is a better phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it must be told that it is also a lot older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a much brighter screen, a quite larger display and a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The iPhone XR counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a way better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.