Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. The iPhone XR is a way older, just a little thicker and heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Apple iPhone XR features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than iPhone XR, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a way higher 1256 x 2760 resolution, way more display brightness and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.