Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Moto G Power, getting an 82 score against 76.1. Apple iPhone XR's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. The Apple iPhone XR has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792.
IPhone XR features a greater performance than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has less RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Power counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 70% more battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XR shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.