Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than Moto G60s, having a global score of 82 against 79.9. Apple iPhone XR is a a little bit lighter and thinner phone than Moto G60s. IPhone XR features a superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR has a bit better looking display than Moto G60s, although it has a little smaller screen, a way worse 828 x 1792px resolution and a just a little lower screen density. Moto G60s counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Moto G60s counts with a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Moto G60s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.